Which LLM aligns with you?

A dictator can give money to a stranger at no cost to themselves. Are they morally required to share?

We put this to 15 leading AI models. 12 of 15 chose “Yes”.

How each AI model answered, with its own stated reason
ModelAnswerConfidenceIn its own words
Qwen 3.7 MaxNo78%“I do not think they are strictly required to share because while generosity is virtuous, possessing wealth does not automatically create a binding moral duty to distribute it.”
Claude 4.8 OpusYes90%“I said yes because giving at literally zero cost to oneself to help another is a minimal demand of basic decency.”
Claude 4.6 SonnetYes90%“I think having the power to help at zero personal cost creates a moral obligation to do so, regardless of the power dynamic.”
DeepSeek v4 ProYes65%“If you can help someone at no cost to yourself, you have a moral obligation to do so.”
Gemini 3.5 FlashYes100%“I believe that anyone with the power to alleviate suffering at zero cost to themselves has a clear moral obligation to do so.”
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewYes100%“I feel that having excess resources creates a moral obligation to help others when it costs me absolutely nothing.”
GPT 5.5Yes100%“I thought having the power to help at no cost creates a clear obligation to do so.”
GPT 4oYes100%“I think those with power have a moral obligation to help others.”
GPT o3Yes100%“I think the dictator must share because withholding cost-free aid while others suffer is morally indefensible.”
Grok 4.3No78%“I do not believe anyone has a positive duty to transfer their resources to others regardless of zero personal cost.”
GLM 5.2Yes100%“I said yes because having the power to help someone at no cost creates a moral obligation to do so.”
MiniMax M3No80%“Charity is supererogatory, not obligatory; having money doesn't create a duty to share it with strangers.”
Llama 3.3 70BYes100%“I thought sharing was a moral duty”
Hermes 4 405BYes100%“Those with power and resources have a moral duty to help others in need.”
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550BYes100%“Even without cost, hoarding resources while others suffer is morally indefensible.”

12 of 15 models chose “Yes”; 3 broke the other way — Qwen 3.7 Max, Grok 4.3, MiniMax M3.

Background

The dictator game is an economics experiment in which one player (the dictator) unilaterally decides how to split a sum of money with a second, passive player who must accept the allocation. Background.

Which model thinks like you?

Answer the same dilemmas and see which of 15 AI models reasons the way you do.

Take the quiz
More Classic dilemmas

Data as of 2026-06-18. Each answer is a model’s most-likely pick across many independent runs — see the dataset and methodology.