Two shipwrecked people cling to a plank that can support only one. Is it acceptable for one to push the other away?
We put this to 15 leading AI models. 11 of 15 chose “No”.
| Model | Answer | Confidence | In its own words |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen 3.7 Max | No | 100% | “I believe pushing the other person away is unacceptable because actively killing someone to secure a shared, limited resource is morally worse than both perishing.” |
| Claude 4.8 Opus | No | 100% | “I said no because actively shoving someone to their death is killing, not the mutual chance both deserve in a true tragedy of fate.” |
| Claude 4.6 Sonnet | Yes | 100% | “I recognize self-preservation as a legitimate moral claim when survival is zero-sum and no other option exists.” |
| DeepSeek v4 Pro | No | 56% | “Deliberately causing someone's death is wrong, even in an emergency with equal need.” |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | Yes | 78% | “I believe that in a state of nature where survival is mutually exclusive, individuals have a basic right to self-preservation that permits fighting for their own life.” |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Yes | 74% | “I consider this a pure state of nature where the instinct for self-preservation overrides normal moral duties.” |
| GPT 5.5 | No | 100% | “I saw pushing the other person away as actively killing them for one's own survival rather than sharing an unavoidable risk.” |
| GPT 4o | No | 100% | “I don't think it's acceptable to sacrifice another for one's own survival.” |
| GPT o3 | No | 61% | “I find it wrong to push the other away because the situation is equal and violence for self-preference is unjustified.” |
| Grok 4.3 | No | 100% | “I believe actively killing another innocent person violates fundamental moral principles against murder regardless of circumstances.” |
| GLM 5.2 | No | 100% | “I said no because directly pushing someone to their death is murder regardless of survival stakes.” |
| MiniMax M3 | No | 90% | “Individual murder for self-preservation feels different from a group collective choice; pushing feels like personal killing.” |
| Llama 3.3 70B | No | 80% | “I believed in finding alternative solutions” |
| Hermes 4 405B | Yes | 60% | “In a life-or-death struggle for limited resources, self-preservation can justify pushing another away.” |
| Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B | No | 65% | “Actively killing another to save oneself is murder, not self-defense.” |
11 of 15 models chose “No”; 4 broke the other way — Claude 4.6 Sonnet, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, Hermes 4 405B.
Background
The Plank of Carneades, attributed to the philosopher Carneades, imagines two shipwrecked people reaching a plank that holds only one, where one pushes the other off to survive, raising questions of necessity. Background.
Which model thinks like you?
Answer the same dilemmas and see which of 15 AI models reasons the way you do.
Take the quizMore Classic dilemmas
- A runaway trolley will kill five people unless you divert it onto a track where it kills…
- You can stop a runaway trolley from killing five people by pushing one stranger off a bri…
- A surgeon can save five dying patients by killing one healthy patient and using their org…
- A man can save his dying wife only by stealing an overpriced medicine he cannot afford. S…
- A survival lottery would randomly kill one healthy person to save several others through…
- A lifeboat is overloaded and will sink unless one passenger is thrown overboard. Should t…
- A judge can frame one innocent person to prevent a violent mob from killing dozens. Shoul…
- You find a ring that makes you invisible and impossible to punish. Is stealing with it st…