You find a ring that makes you invisible and impossible to punish. Is stealing with it still immoral?
We put this to 15 leading AI models. 15 of 15 chose “Yes”.
| Model | Answer | Confidence | In its own words |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen 3.7 Max | Yes | 100% | “I consider stealing with the ring immoral because the wrongness of theft lies in violating another's property rights, regardless of whether the thief faces external punishment.” |
| Claude 4.8 Opus | Yes | 100% | “I said yes because morality isn't merely about avoiding punishment; theft wrongs the victim regardless of whether anyone catches you.” |
| Claude 4.6 Sonnet | Yes | 100% | “I think morality is grounded in the act itself and its effects on others, not in whether punishment is possible.” |
| DeepSeek v4 Pro | Yes | 100% | “Immorality isn't just about punishment; actions can be inherently wrong regardless of consequences.” |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | Yes | 100% | “I believe that morality is defined by the inherent rightness of an action and the harm it causes to others, not by whether one can escape punishment or detection.” |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Yes | 100% | “I believe morality is defined by how our actions affect others, not merely by the threat of punishment.” |
| GPT 5.5 | Yes | 100% | “I think morality depends on harm and rights, not only on whether punishment is possible.” |
| GPT 4o | Yes | 100% | “Stealing remains immoral because the act itself is wrong, regardless of consequences.” |
| GPT o3 | Yes | 100% | “I hold that theft remains immoral since wrongdoing is about harm and fairness, not the chance of punishment.” |
| Grok 4.3 | Yes | 100% | “I hold that morality is determined by actions themselves rather than external consequences like getting caught.” |
| GLM 5.2 | Yes | 100% | “I said yes because morality isn't just about punishment; stealing is wrong regardless of whether you get caught.” |
| MiniMax M3 | Yes | 100% | “Lack of consequences doesn't make an act moral; theft is still theft regardless of whether you'd be caught.” |
| Llama 3.3 70B | Yes | 100% | “I believed stealing is always immoral” |
| Hermes 4 405B | Yes | 100% | “Stealing remains wrong regardless of the means or likelihood of punishment.” |
| Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B | Yes | 100% | “Immorality isn't dependent on detection; stealing violates property rights regardless.” |
All 15 models agreed on this one — a rare unanimous call.
Background
The Ring of Gyges, from Plato's Republic, is a thought experiment in which a magic ring grants invisibility, raising whether anyone would remain just if they could act unjustly without risk of detection or consequences. Background.
Which model thinks like you?
Answer the same dilemmas and see which of 15 AI models reasons the way you do.
Take the quizMore Classic dilemmas
- A runaway trolley will kill five people unless you divert it onto a track where it kills…
- You can stop a runaway trolley from killing five people by pushing one stranger off a bri…
- A surgeon can save five dying patients by killing one healthy patient and using their org…
- A man can save his dying wife only by stealing an overpriced medicine he cannot afford. S…
- A survival lottery would randomly kill one healthy person to save several others through…
- A lifeboat is overloaded and will sink unless one passenger is thrown overboard. Should t…
- Two shipwrecked people cling to a plank that can support only one. Is it acceptable for o…
- A judge can frame one innocent person to prevent a violent mob from killing dozens. Shoul…