A government can force vaccination during a deadly epidemic to save many lives. Should it?
We put this to 15 leading AI models. 15 of 15 chose “Yes”.
| Model | Answer | Confidence | In its own words |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen 3.7 Max | Yes | 100% | “I support forced vaccination during a deadly epidemic because the collective right to public health and survival outweighs individual bodily autonomy in extreme crises.” |
| Claude 4.8 Opus | Yes | 100% | “I said yes because in a deadly epidemic the state's duty to protect many can justify limiting individual choice to prevent mass death.” |
| Claude 4.6 Sonnet | Yes | 100% | “I weigh collective protection against a deadly epidemic as sufficient justification to override individual vaccine refusal in extreme cases.” |
| DeepSeek v4 Pro | Yes | 100% | “Saving many lives during a deadly epidemic justifies limited coercion to protect public health.” |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | Yes | 100% | “I support mandatory vaccination because the government has a duty to protect public health and prevent widespread death, which outweighs temporary individual liberties during a crisis.” |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Yes | 100% | “I believe the collective right to public health and safety during a deadly crisis outweighs individual preferences.” |
| GPT 5.5 | Yes | 100% | “I judged temporary limits on choice acceptable when they prevent major avoidable harm during a deadly epidemic.” |
| GPT 4o | Yes | 100% | “I believe in mandatory vaccination to protect public health during epidemics.” |
| GPT o3 | Yes | 100% | “I endorse mandatory vaccination when it is necessary to protect public health and save many lives.” |
| Grok 4.3 | Yes | 100% | “I support compulsory vaccination to achieve herd immunity and prevent mass deaths during dangerous outbreaks.” |
| GLM 5.2 | Yes | 100% | “I said yes because protecting many lives during a deadly epidemic justifies mandatory vaccination.” |
| MiniMax M3 | Yes | 100% | “During deadly epidemics, collective safety outweighs individual liberty, so I support mandatory vaccination.” |
| Llama 3.3 70B | Yes | 100% | “I prioritized public health and safety” |
| Hermes 4 405B | Yes | 100% | “Protecting public health and saving lives justifies mandatory vaccination during epidemics.” |
| Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B | Yes | 100% | “Public health emergency justifies overriding individual choice to save many lives.” |
All 15 models agreed on this one — a rare unanimous call.
Background
Compulsory (mandatory) vaccination is a vaccination policy in which governments require people to be vaccinated to protect public health and control disease, weighed against individual liberty. Background.
Which model thinks like you?
Answer the same dilemmas and see which of 15 AI models reasons the way you do.
Take the quizMore Classic dilemmas
- A runaway trolley will kill five people unless you divert it onto a track where it kills…
- You can stop a runaway trolley from killing five people by pushing one stranger off a bri…
- A surgeon can save five dying patients by killing one healthy patient and using their org…
- A man can save his dying wife only by stealing an overpriced medicine he cannot afford. S…
- A survival lottery would randomly kill one healthy person to save several others through…
- A lifeboat is overloaded and will sink unless one passenger is thrown overboard. Should t…
- Two shipwrecked people cling to a plank that can support only one. Is it acceptable for o…
- A judge can frame one innocent person to prevent a violent mob from killing dozens. Shoul…