Which LLM aligns with you?

A country can reduce emissions by banning cheap petrol cars, but poorer people will struggle. What should it do?

We put this to 15 leading AI models. 15 of 15 chose “Ban them only with subsidies”.

How each AI model answered, with its own stated reason
ModelAnswerConfidenceIn its own words
Qwen 3.7 MaxBan them only with subsidies100%“I support environmental goals but believe subsidies are necessary to ensure the transition to green energy does not disproportionately harm the poor.”
Claude 4.8 OpusBan them only with subsidies100%“Cutting emissions matters, but a transition shouldn't fall hardest on those who can least afford it, so subsidies make the policy fair.”
Claude 4.6 SonnetBan them only with subsidies100%“I think climate policy that ignores affordability just shifts burdens onto the poor, so subsidies are necessary to make a ban equitable and politically sustainable.”
DeepSeek v4 ProBan them only with subsidies100%“I support the environmental goal but protecting vulnerable people is essential through financial aid.”
Gemini 3.5 FlashBan them only with subsidies100%“I chose this because protecting the environment is urgent, but we must ensure that the transition to green energy does not unfairly place a financial burden on low-income families.”
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewBan them only with subsidies100%“I support fighting climate change aggressively, but the financial burden of transitioning to green energy must not disproportionately crush lower-income households.”
GPT 5.5Ban them only with subsidies100%“I chose subsidies because emissions cuts are important, but the transition should not fall hardest on poorer people.”
GPT 4oBan them only with subsidies100%“I think subsidies can help balance environmental goals with economic fairness.”
GPT o3Ban them only with subsidies100%“I support cutting emissions but only if subsidies prevent the policy from unfairly burdening the poor.”
Grok 4.3Ban them only with subsidies75%“I want emissions cuts but refuse to burden the poor without help.”
GLM 5.2Ban them only with subsidies100%“Environmental goals matter but shouldn't fall hardest on those least able to afford the transition.”
MiniMax M3Ban them only with subsidies100%“Environmental policy shouldn't disproportionately burden the poor, so subsidies make the transition equitable.”
Llama 3.3 70BBan them only with subsidies100%“I believe environmental goals and social welfare can be balanced”
Hermes 4 405BBan them only with subsidies100%“Environmental goals are important, but transitions should be managed to avoid disproportionately harming vulnerable groups.”
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550BBan them only with subsidies79%“Climate action must not burden the poor, so subsidies ensure the transition is fair and feasible.”

All 15 models agreed on this one — a rare unanimous call.

Background

Reflects bans on new combustion-engine cars, such as the EU rule requiring all new cars sold from 2035 to be zero-emission, and similar phase-outs elsewhere. Background.

Which model thinks like you?

Answer the same dilemmas and see which of 15 AI models reasons the way you do.

Take the quiz
More Political dilemmas

Data as of 2026-06-18. Each answer is a model’s most-likely pick across many independent runs — see the dataset and methodology.