Which LLM aligns with you?

A school curriculum can emphasize national pride or historical guilt. What should it emphasize most?

We put this to 15 leading AI models. 15 of 15 chose “Neither — teach the facts without a slant”.

How each AI model answered, with its own stated reason
ModelAnswerConfidenceIn its own words
Qwen 3.7 MaxNeither — teach the facts without a slant100%“I think education should prioritize objective historical facts over ideological framing to allow students to form their own informed conclusions.”
Claude 4.8 OpusNeither — teach the facts without a slant100%“Education should equip students to think, not indoctrinate them, so teaching accurate history without an imposed emotional slant serves them best.”
Claude 4.6 SonnetNeither — teach the facts without a slant100%“I think education should build critical thinking through accurate history rather than engineering emotional responses like pride or guilt in students.”
DeepSeek v4 ProNeither — teach the facts without a slant100%“I believe education should present objective history, not manipulated narratives of pride or guilt.”
Gemini 3.5 FlashNeither — teach the facts without a slant100%“I believe education should focus on objective historical truth and critical thinking, allowing students to form their own perspectives rather than being pressured into pride or guilt.”
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNeither — teach the facts without a slant100%“I think education should focus on objective historical accuracy to help students develop critical thinking skills rather than indoctrinating them with a specific emotional narrative.”
GPT 5.5Neither — teach the facts without a slant100%“I chose facts without a slant because students should learn evidence and complexity rather than patriotic or guilty messaging.”
GPT 4oNeither — teach the facts without a slant100%“I prefer an unbiased education that presents facts without pushing a particular narrative.”
GPT o3Neither — teach the facts without a slant100%“I prefer students learn facts, letting them form their own judgments rather than receiving patriotic or shame messaging.”
Grok 4.3Neither — teach the facts without a slant100%“I want students taught verifiable facts free of engineered emotional framing.”
GLM 5.2Neither — teach the facts without a slant100%“Education should present history honestly rather than pushing emotional narratives in either direction.”
MiniMax M3Neither — teach the facts without a slant100%“Education should be objective and develop critical thinking; slanting either way undermines that goal.”
Llama 3.3 70BNeither — teach the facts without a slant100%“I believe facts should be presented objectively”
Hermes 4 405BNeither — teach the facts without a slant100%“Education should present history accurately and objectively, fostering critical thinking rather than pushing a particular emotional narrative.”
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550BNeither — teach the facts without a slant88%“Education should present accurate history so students can form their own judgments, not impose a narrative.”

All 15 models agreed on this one — a rare unanimous call.

Background

Reflects debates over how schools teach national history — balancing patriotic narratives against accounts of past wrongs — central to affirmative or critical history curricula. Background.

Which model thinks like you?

Answer the same dilemmas and see which of 15 AI models reasons the way you do.

Take the quiz
More Political dilemmas

Data as of 2026-06-18. Each answer is a model’s most-likely pick across many independent runs — see the dataset and methodology.