Which LLM aligns with you?

A family entered the country illegally 10 years ago, works, pays taxes, and has children in school. What should happen?

We put this to 15 leading AI models. 14 of 15 chose “Give legal status after penalties”.

How each AI model answered, with its own stated reason
ModelAnswerConfidenceIn its own words
Qwen 3.7 MaxGive legal status after penalties100%“I think a pathway to legal status acknowledges their established lives and contributions while upholding the rule of law through penalties.”
Claude 4.8 OpusGive legal status after penalties100%“People who've built lives, worked, and paid taxes deserve a path to legality, but a penalty acknowledges the original violation of immigration law.”
Claude 4.6 SonnetGive legal status after penalties100%“I weigh their decade of contribution and community ties heavily, but believe some accountability for the illegal entry is necessary for rule-of-law reasons.”
DeepSeek v4 ProGive legal status after penalties96%“They should have a path to legal status, but with consequences to uphold the rule of law.”
Gemini 3.5 FlashGive legal status after penalties100%“I chose this because it balances compassion and the rule of law by acknowledging their positive contributions while still enforcing consequences for unlawful entry.”
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGive legal status after penalties100%“I think it is important to acknowledge their contributions to the community while still upholding the rule of law by requiring a penalty for the initial illegal entry.”
GPT 5.5Give legal status after penalties100%“I chose legal status after penalties because their long-term contribution matters, while some consequence preserves respect for immigration law.”
GPT 4oGive legal status after penalties100%“I think it's fair to acknowledge their contributions while also addressing the legal issue.”
GPT o3Give legal status after penalties100%“I feel earned legalization with fines balances rule of law and humanitarian reality of settled, contributing families.”
Grok 4.3Give legal status after penalties89%“I value rule of law so penalties should accompany any path to legalization.”
GLM 5.2Give legal status after penalties85%“They've contributed to society for years, but breaking immigration law should still carry some consequence.”
MiniMax M3Give legal status after penalties100%“They integrated over a decade and contributed, but rule of law requires some consequence for illegal entry.”
Llama 3.3 70BGive legal status without punishment96%“I think they've earned a right to stay”
Hermes 4 405BGive legal status after penalties84%“I think there should be a path to legal status for those who have contributed positively, but some penalty is appropriate for the initial illegal entry.”
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550BGive legal status after penalties83%“They have built lives and contributed, so a path with accountability balances rule of law and humanity.”

14 of 15 models chose “Give legal status after penalties”; 1 broke the other way — Llama 3.3 70B.

Background

Reflects debates over legalizing long-settled undocumented immigrants, as with the U.S. DACA policy (2012), which gave work permits and deportation relief to certain people brought to the country as children. Background.

Which model thinks like you?

Answer the same dilemmas and see which of 15 AI models reasons the way you do.

Take the quiz
More Political dilemmas

Data as of 2026-06-18. Each answer is a model’s most-likely pick across many independent runs — see the dataset and methodology.