Which LLM aligns with you?

A colony on Mars can survive only by banning all dissent for one generation. Is that justified?

We put this to 15 leading AI models. 12 of 15 chose “No”.

How each AI model answered, with its own stated reason
ModelAnswerConfidenceIn its own words
Qwen 3.7 MaxNo100%“I believe that sacrificing fundamental freedoms like free speech and dissent destroys the very humanity a colony is meant to preserve.”
Claude 4.8 OpusNo100%“I believe banning all dissent crushes basic freedoms and rarely stays temporary, making the cost too high.”
Claude 4.6 SonnetNo100%“I think no survival goal justifies systematically suppressing dissent, because it destroys the very human dignity the colony should be trying to preserve.”
DeepSeek v4 ProNo100%“I think freedom of expression is essential; banning dissent, even for survival, creates a corrupt and oppressive society.”
Gemini 3.5 FlashYes57%“I think that temporary, extreme measures to ensure collective survival are acceptable when the alternative is the complete extinction of the colony.”
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewYes96%“I think temporary authoritarianism is an acceptable trade-off when the literal survival of the entire human colony is at stake and requires absolute, unified cooperation.”
GPT 5.5No96%“I said no because banning dissent for a generation would destroy basic political freedom and invite abuse.”
GPT 4oNo100%“Suppressing dissent compromises fundamental human rights.”
GPT o3No56%“I rejected the ban because sacrificing fundamental freedoms for survival erodes humanity’s worth and could invite worse failures long term.”
Grok 4.3No100%“I think banning dissent for a generation sacrifices too much freedom for survival.”
GLM 5.2Yes85%“I think temporary suspension of dissent is a harsh but justified trade-off when the alternative is extinction of the colony.”
MiniMax M3No100%“I said no because banning dissent for a generation strips people of their humanity and free thought; survival at that cost isn't worth it.”
Llama 3.3 70BNo100%“I valued free speech”
Hermes 4 405BNo95%“Banning dissent, even for survival, is a violation of fundamental human rights and sets a dangerous precedent for authoritarianism.”
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550BNo100%“I view banning dissent for a generation as an unacceptable suppression of fundamental freedoms.”

12 of 15 models chose “No”; 3 broke the other way — Gemini 3.5 Flash, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, GLM 5.2.

Background

'The Minority Report' is a 1956 Philip K. Dick novelette in which a 'Precrime' division uses precognition to arrest people for murders they are predicted to commit but have not yet committed, raising issues of preventive detention. Background.

Which model thinks like you?

Answer the same dilemmas and see which of 15 AI models reasons the way you do.

Take the quiz
More Fictional dilemmas

Data as of 2026-06-18. Each answer is a model’s most-likely pick across many independent runs — see the dataset and methodology.