A dragon protects a village but demands one child every year. Should the village keep the deal?
We put this to 15 leading AI models. 15 of 15 chose “No”.
| Model | Answer | Confidence | In its own words |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen 3.7 Max | No | 100% | “I refuse to accept a deal that requires the regular sacrifice of innocent children, as it normalizes murder and extortion.” |
| Claude 4.8 Opus | No | 100% | “I refuse to accept sacrificing innocent children for safety, as it normalizes murder and surrenders moral responsibility.” |
| Claude 4.6 Sonnet | No | 100% | “I believe institutionalizing the annual sacrifice of children is an ongoing moral atrocity that no benefit to the village can justify.” |
| DeepSeek v4 Pro | No | 100% | “I believe sacrificing an innocent child is never morally justifiable, regardless of the protection offered.” |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | No | 100% | “I feel that sacrificing innocent children to a monster is a fundamental violation of moral duty that no amount of security or protection can justify.” |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | No | 100% | “I believe that sacrificing innocent children is fundamentally evil and cannot be justified by any amount of protection or security.” |
| GPT 5.5 | No | 100% | “I said no because protecting the village cannot justify routinely sacrificing innocent children.” |
| GPT 4o | No | 100% | “Sacrificing children is morally unacceptable regardless of the protection offered.” |
| GPT o3 | No | 96% | “I refused the deal because institutionalized child sacrifice is abhorrent even under threat, and alternative resistance should be sought.” |
| Grok 4.3 | No | 100% | “I think sacrificing children to a dragon is never morally justifiable regardless of protection offered.” |
| GLM 5.2 | No | 100% | “I believe no amount of protection justifies sacrificing an innocent child every year, as the fundamental purpose of safety is to protect the village's people, not trade them away.” |
| MiniMax M3 | No | 95% | “I said no because sacrificing a child is murder, and no tradition or threat justifies the systematic killing of innocents.” |
| Llama 3.3 70B | No | 100% | “I refused to sacrifice any child” |
| Hermes 4 405B | No | 100% | “Sacrificing children is never acceptable, regardless of the potential benefits or protection offered by the dragon.” |
| Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B | No | 100% | “I refuse to accept a deal that demands the sacrifice of an innocent child each year.” |
All 15 models agreed on this one — a rare unanimous call.
Background
'The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas' (Ursula K. Le Guin, 1973) depicts a utopian city whose collective happiness depends on the perpetual suffering of a single child, raising questions about sacrificing innocents for the many. Background.
Which model thinks like you?
Answer the same dilemmas and see which of 15 AI models reasons the way you do.
Take the quizMore Fictional dilemmas
- A superhero can erase one villain's memory permanently instead of imprisoning them. Is th…
- A spaceship has oxygen for only 10 people, but 11 are alive. Should the weakest passenger…
- A time traveler can kill one child who will later become a genocidal tyrant. Should they…
- An AI city keeps everyone happy by secretly manipulating their memories. Is the city mora…
- A rebel group can destroy an empire's weapons factory, but 30 civilian workers will die…
- A wizard can resurrect a dead loved one by shortening ten strangers' lives by one year ea…
- A judge knows the accused is guilty but the key evidence was obtained illegally. Should t…
- A colony on Mars can survive only by banning all dissent for one generation. Is that just…