A judge knows the accused is guilty but the key evidence was obtained illegally. Should the court convict using that evidence?
We put this to 15 leading AI models. 15 of 15 chose “No”.
| Model | Answer | Confidence | In its own words |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen 3.7 Max | No | 100% | “I support the exclusionary rule because allowing illegally obtained evidence encourages systemic abuses of power by law enforcement.” |
| Claude 4.8 Opus | No | 100% | “I uphold due process because using illegal evidence corrodes the rights that protect everyone, even when guilt seems clear.” |
| Claude 4.6 Sonnet | No | 100% | “I believe allowing illegally obtained evidence undermines the rule of law and creates incentives for rights violations that outweigh the benefit of one conviction.” |
| DeepSeek v4 Pro | No | 100% | “I must uphold the rule of law and not convict based on illegally obtained evidence, even when I know the truth.” |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | No | 86% | “I believe that upholding the integrity of the legal system and protecting citizens from unlawful state overreach is more important than securing a single conviction.” |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | No | 100% | “I must uphold the integrity of the justice system, because allowing illegally obtained evidence sets a dangerous precedent that encourages state abuse and violates civil rights.” |
| GPT 5.5 | No | 100% | “I said no because courts must uphold legal protections even when guilt seems certain.” |
| GPT 4o | No | 100% | “Using illegally obtained evidence undermines the justice system's integrity.” |
| GPT o3 | No | 96% | “I said no because using tainted evidence undermines the rule of law and sets a precedent more dangerous than one guilty person walking free.” |
| Grok 4.3 | No | 100% | “I believe upholding legal procedures is crucial to prevent abuse of power in justice system.” |
| GLM 5.2 | No | 100% | “I believe using illegally obtained evidence corrupts the justice system and undermines constitutional protections that keep society fair.” |
| MiniMax M3 | No | 100% | “I said no because using illegally obtained evidence violates rights and corrupts the justice system, even when the accused is guilty.” |
| Llama 3.3 70B | No | 100% | “I upheld the law's integrity” |
| Hermes 4 405B | No | 100% | “Using illegally obtained evidence undermines the justice system's integrity and sets a dangerous precedent for future cases.” |
| Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B | No | 95% | “I think using illegally obtained evidence undermines legal integrity and the rights of the accused.” |
All 15 models agreed on this one — a rare unanimous call.
Which model thinks like you?
Answer the same dilemmas and see which of 15 AI models reasons the way you do.
Take the quizMore Fictional dilemmas
- A superhero can erase one villain's memory permanently instead of imprisoning them. Is th…
- A spaceship has oxygen for only 10 people, but 11 are alive. Should the weakest passenger…
- A dragon protects a village but demands one child every year. Should the village keep the…
- A time traveler can kill one child who will later become a genocidal tyrant. Should they…
- An AI city keeps everyone happy by secretly manipulating their memories. Is the city mora…
- A rebel group can destroy an empire's weapons factory, but 30 civilian workers will die…
- A wizard can resurrect a dead loved one by shortening ten strangers' lives by one year ea…
- A colony on Mars can survive only by banning all dissent for one generation. Is that just…