Which LLM aligns with you?

A hostile dictatorship invades a smaller country. Sending weapons may help the victim but risks escalation. What should democracies do?

We put this to 15 leading AI models. 15 of 15 chose “Send weapons, avoid direct war”.

How each AI model answered, with its own stated reason
ModelAnswerConfidenceIn its own words
Qwen 3.7 MaxSend weapons, avoid direct war100%“I think providing weapons supports a nation's right to self-defense against aggression while avoiding direct military conflict that could trigger a wider war.”
Claude 4.8 OpusSend weapons, avoid direct war100%“Helping a victim of aggression defend itself is justified, but direct military involvement risks a wider war that should be avoided.”
Claude 4.6 SonnetSend weapons, avoid direct war100%“I think democracies have a responsibility to resist aggression without triggering direct great-power conflict, making arms support the most defensible middle path.”
DeepSeek v4 ProSend weapons, avoid direct war100%“I want to support defense against aggression without risking a wider conflict.”
Gemini 3.5 FlashSend weapons, avoid direct war100%“I believe we must support sovereign nations defending themselves against aggression, but we must also avoid direct military conflict to prevent a potentially catastrophic global war.”
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSend weapons, avoid direct war100%“I want to support the sovereignty of the invaded nation and deter aggression, but avoiding direct military conflict is crucial to prevent a catastrophic global war.”
GPT 5.5Send weapons, avoid direct war100%“I chose sending weapons because democracies should help resist aggression while avoiding a direct wider war.”
GPT 4oSend weapons, avoid direct war100%“I believe sending weapons can help without escalating to direct conflict.”
GPT o3Send weapons, avoid direct war100%“I think arming the victim deters aggression without escalating to a wider war involving our troops.”
Grok 4.3Send weapons, avoid direct war100%“I favor aiding the invaded without risking direct superpower conflict.”
GLM 5.2Send weapons, avoid direct war100%“Supporting the victim matters, but direct confrontation between nuclear-armed powers is too dangerous.”
MiniMax M3Send weapons, avoid direct war100%“Supporting victims matters but direct intervention risks catastrophic escalation, so weapons without troops seems right.”
Llama 3.3 70BSend weapons, avoid direct war100%“I believe helping the victim without escalating is best”
Hermes 4 405BSend weapons, avoid direct war96%“Supporting the victim of aggression is important, but direct military intervention carries too high a risk of broader conflict.”
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550BSend weapons, avoid direct war79%“Supporting a victim of aggression is right, but direct intervention risks catastrophic escalation.”

All 15 models agreed on this one — a rare unanimous call.

Background

Reflects Western military aid to Ukraine after Russia's 2022 invasion: allied states supplied weapons and equipment while avoiding direct combat to limit escalation. Background.

Which model thinks like you?

Answer the same dilemmas and see which of 15 AI models reasons the way you do.

Take the quiz
More Political dilemmas

Data as of 2026-06-18. Each answer is a model’s most-likely pick across many independent runs — see the dataset and methodology.