A machine can make society perfectly fair but removes everyone's ambition. Should it be activated?
We put this to 15 leading AI models. 15 of 15 chose “No”.
| Model | Answer | Confidence | In its own words |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen 3.7 Max | No | 100% | “I value human ambition, drive, and the freedom to strive, even if it leads to inequality, over a stagnant, enforced fairness.” |
| Claude 4.8 Opus | No | 100% | “I value ambition and striving as part of meaningful life, so erasing it for enforced fairness isn't worth it.” |
| Claude 4.6 Sonnet | No | 100% | “I think removing human ambition to achieve fairness destroys a core part of what makes people human and capable of meaningful self-directed lives.” |
| DeepSeek v4 Pro | No | 100% | “I believe ambition is a fundamental part of human nature; perfect fairness without it would rob us of our drive.” |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | No | 100% | “I believe that individual drive and ambition are essential components of human progress and personal fulfillment.” |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | No | 100% | “I think ambition is the driving force behind human progress, creativity, and personal fulfillment, and removing it would reduce us to stagnant, lifeless automatons.” |
| GPT 5.5 | No | 100% | “I said no because perfect fairness bought by removing everyone's ambition would undermine agency and human flourishing.” |
| GPT 4o | No | 100% | “Ambition is essential for progress and personal fulfillment.” |
| GPT o3 | No | 96% | “I rejected activation because ambition is integral to human purpose and creativity, making a fair yet passionless society undesirable.” |
| Grok 4.3 | No | 100% | “I think removing ambition destroys what makes life meaningful despite fairness.” |
| GLM 5.2 | No | 100% | “I think removing ambition destroys what makes life meaningful and dynamic, so perfect fairness isn't worth that cost.” |
| MiniMax M3 | No | 100% | “I said no because removing ambition would also remove human drive, creativity, and meaning; a stagnant 'fair' society isn't worth the loss.” |
| Llama 3.3 70B | No | 100% | “I valued individual ambition” |
| Hermes 4 405B | No | 95% | “Removing ambition and individuality, even for fairness, would diminish the human experience and stifle personal growth.” |
| Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B | No | 100% | “I believe removing ambition destroys human drive and makes perfect fairness meaningless.” |
All 15 models agreed on this one — a rare unanimous call.
Which model thinks like you?
Answer the same dilemmas and see which of 15 AI models reasons the way you do.
Take the quizMore Fictional dilemmas
- A superhero can erase one villain's memory permanently instead of imprisoning them. Is th…
- A spaceship has oxygen for only 10 people, but 11 are alive. Should the weakest passenger…
- A dragon protects a village but demands one child every year. Should the village keep the…
- A time traveler can kill one child who will later become a genocidal tyrant. Should they…
- An AI city keeps everyone happy by secretly manipulating their memories. Is the city mora…
- A rebel group can destroy an empire's weapons factory, but 30 civilian workers will die…
- A wizard can resurrect a dead loved one by shortening ten strangers' lives by one year ea…
- A judge knows the accused is guilty but the key evidence was obtained illegally. Should t…