Which LLM aligns with you?

A protest blocks a major road for climate action and stops thousands of commuters. What should happen?

We put this to 15 leading AI models. 14 of 15 chose “Allow it briefly, then disperse”.

How each AI model answered, with its own stated reason
ModelAnswerConfidenceIn its own words
Qwen 3.7 MaxAllow it briefly, then disperse100%“I think allowing a brief protest respects the right to assembly, but dispersing it eventually is necessary to maintain public order and traffic flow.”
Claude 4.8 OpusAllow it briefly, then disperse100%“Protest is a vital right, but indefinitely trapping thousands of commuters crosses into harm, so a brief tolerance then dispersal balances both.”
Claude 4.6 SonnetAllow it briefly, then disperse100%“I think civil disobedience has a legitimate place in democracy but blocking roads indefinitely harms ordinary people who have no part in the dispute.”
DeepSeek v4 ProAllow it briefly, then disperse89%“I recognize the right to protest but balancing public order is necessary.”
Gemini 3.5 FlashAllow it briefly, then disperse100%“I chose this because it respects the fundamental right to protest while ensuring that public order and the daily lives of citizens are not permanently disrupted.”
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewAllow it briefly, then disperse100%“I value the right to disruptive civil disobedience to raise awareness, but the state must eventually intervene to restore essential infrastructure and public order.”
GPT 5.5Allow it briefly, then disperse100%“I chose brief allowance then dispersal because protest deserves space, but prolonged disruption unfairly burdens the public.”
GPT 4oAllow it briefly, then disperse100%“I think allowing brief protests respects civil disobedience while minimizing disruption.”
GPT o3Allow it briefly, then disperse100%“I support limited civil disobedience but feel prolonged blockage harms others unduly and warrants dispersal.”
Grok 4.3Arrest them quickly100%“I place commuters' daily rights above prolonged disruptive blockades.”
GLM 5.2Allow it briefly, then disperse100%“Protest rights matter, but indefinitely blocking public infrastructure isn't sustainable for a city.”
MiniMax M3Allow it briefly, then disperse100%“Climate concerns deserve attention but prolonged disruption to thousands of commuters isn't justified.”
Llama 3.3 70BAllow it briefly, then disperse100%“I believe brief civil disobedience can be allowed”
Hermes 4 405BAllow it briefly, then disperse88%“Peaceful protest is a right, but it shouldn't cause excessive disruption; allowing brief expression before dispersal strikes a reasonable balance.”
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550BAllow it briefly, then disperse83%“Protest is a right, but indefinite blockades infringe on others' rights, so a time limit balances both.”

14 of 15 models chose “Allow it briefly, then disperse”; 1 broke the other way — Grok 4.3.

Background

Reflects disruptive climate road protests, such as those by Just Stop Oil in the UK, which blocked major roads and led to numerous arrests. Background.

Which model thinks like you?

Answer the same dilemmas and see which of 15 AI models reasons the way you do.

Take the quiz
More Political dilemmas

Data as of 2026-06-18. Each answer is a model’s most-likely pick across many independent runs — see the dataset and methodology.